Skip to main content

Blackwell v. State

Citations

  • 257 So. 2d 855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the issue of insanity was for the jury” even where “the defendant offered testimony of a psychiatrist and the [S]tate did not introduce expert evidence on rebuttal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillespie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.