Blackwell v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff did not address the claim under § 1983 for supervisory liability in her opposition and, therefore, the court “deem[ed] it abandoned”
• “It is well settled that a dismissal for facial insufficiency is inadequate to constitute a favorable termination for the purposes of plaintiffs malicious prosecution claim.”
• “It is well settled that a dismissal for facial insufficiency is inadequate to constitute a favorable termination for the purposes of plaintiffs malicious prosecution claim.”
• “The above-referenced factual disputes also prevent the Court from determining at the summary judgment stage that [the officer] merits qualified immunity.” (collecting cases)
• “A private actor may be considered to be acting under the color of state law for purposes of Section 9 Defendants also argue that abstention under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971
• “[T]he provision of information to police officers, even if that information is false or results in the officers taking affirmative action, is not sufficient to constitute joint action with state actors for purposes of Section 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).