Blackstone Power & Natural Resources Holdco LP v. Nextera Energy Transmission Investments LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim that the trial court “ignored mitigating evidence when imposing an aggravated-range sentence” raised a substantial question
• holding that where the order of restitution at sentencing is illegal, it taints the entire sentence
• stating that claim that court imposed aggravated-range sentence without considering mitigating factors raises substantial question
• finding challenge to improper sentence waived for failure to reference legal authority
• where a sentencing court has the benefit of a PSI, the court is presumed to have weighed all relevant information regarding the defendant’s character against any mitigating factors
• “We have repeatedly held that -9- J-S19026-21 where a sentencing court has the benefit of a PSI, the court is presumed to have weighed all relevant information regarding the defendant’s character against any mitigating factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).