Skip to main content
· 5/22/2007

Blackmore v. Powell

Citations

  • 59 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527
  • 150 Cal. App. 4th 1593
  • 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5715
  • 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • easement for parking and garage purposes, with right of exclusive control over garage, did ‘‘not rise to fee ownership’’ because (1) rights accorded grantee were expressly circumscribed and (2
  • easement for parking and garage purposes, with right of exclusive control over garage, did ‘‘not rise to fee ownership’’ because (1) rights accorded grantee were expressly circumscribed and (2) right to exclusive control was intended solely to protect those restricted rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.