Blackmon v. Blackmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts properly impute income from a second job or secondary source where record evidence clearly reveals that such secondary income has been earned on a recurrent or steady basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gulledge v. Gulledge
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-29· cited 7×
• Marks v. Stein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-20· cited 2×
• Harris v. Harris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-17

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-03· cited 28×
• Kangas v. Kangas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-08· cited 18×
• Sullivan v. Sullivan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-10-04· cited 15×
• Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 14×
• Carlsen v. Carlsen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-05-25· cited 14×
• Swanston v. Swanston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 12×
• Misdraji v. Misdraji
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-15· cited 4×
• Leatherwood v. Sandstrom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-24· cited 3×
• Jobe v. Jobe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-13· cited 1×
• Davis v. Davis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 1×