Blackman v. Michael Friedman Publishing Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fixing value of 146 lost transparencies where the “record [wa]s barren of any evidence establishing the lost transparencies’ uniqueness”
• “The proper standard ... is a consideration of uniqueness of the transparencies and plaintiffs earning potential.”
• “The proper standard ... is a consideration of uniqueness of the transparencies and plaintiffs earning potential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• William Gasperini v. The Center for Humanities, Inc., Doing Business as Guidance Associates
  Second Circuit· 1998-07-07· cited 37×
• Grace v. Corbis-Sygma
  Second Circuit· 2007-05-25· cited 20×
• William Gasperini v. The Center for Humanities, Inc., Doing Business as Guidance Associates
  Second Circuit· 1995-09-12· cited 13×
• Raishevich v. Foster
  S.D. New York· 1998-07-17· cited 7×
• Whalen v. Villegas
  Nassau County District Court· 2013-04-01

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• I.C.C. Metals, Inc. v. Municipal Warehouse Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1980-07-01· cited 98×
• Alen MacWeeney, Inc. v. Esquire Associates
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-09-26· cited 8×
• Nierenberg v. Wursteria, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-01-07· cited 7×
• Alen MacWeeney, Inc. v. Esquire Associates
  New York Court of Appeals· 1992-05-05· cited 3×