Blackman v. MacCoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that a cause of action may be stated for negligent destruction of evidence needed for prospective civil litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court
  California Supreme Court· 1989-07-27· cited 218×
• Jerista v. Murray
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-10-12· cited 121×
• Oak Grove School District v. City Title Insurance
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-06-28· cited 75×
• State Ex Rel. Anaya v. Scarborough
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-01-17· cited 61×
• People v. Municipal Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-08-15· cited 60×
• City of San Marino v. Roman Catholic Archbishop
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-05-05· cited 21×
• T.P.B. v. Superior Court of Alameda County
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-02-08· cited 16×
• People v. Pratt
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-07-24· cited 14×
• Humphrey v. APPELLATE DIV. OF SUPERIOR CT.
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-11-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sime v. Malouf
  California Court of Appeal· 1949-12-14· cited 100×
• Keating v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1955-11-01· cited 43×
• Calhoun v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1958-11-18· cited 29×
• MacKie v. Dyer
  California Court of Appeal· 1957-10-14· cited 16×
• In Re Harrington
  California Court of Appeal· 1948-10-05· cited 14×
• Smith v. Crocker First National Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1957-07-29· cited 12×
• McKay v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1950-08-03· cited 10×