Blackman v. Gaebler (In Re Gaebler)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a creditor need only prove that a debtor intentionally committed an act, without just cause or excuse, which necessarily produces injury”
• “[t]his Court finds that the Bankruptcy Court erred in concluding ... that creditor was required to prove that the debtor acted with the specific intent of harming creditor in order to successfully challenge dischargeability in the basis of 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(6)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).