Skip to main content
· 5/24/2005

Blackman v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 613 S.E.2d 460
  • 45 Va. App. 633
  • 2005 Va. App. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an appellate court may affirm a ruling on a ground not relied upon by the trial court if additional findings of fact are not required
  • noting that the affirmance of the appeal on the merits rendered analysis of the Commonwealth’s harmless-error argument unnecessary
  • noting that the affirmance of the appeal on the merits rendered analysis of the Commonwealth’s harmless error argument unnecessary
  • noting that the affirmance of the appeal on the merits rendered analysis of the Commonwealth’s harmless error argument unnecessary
  • noting that the Court’s holding that there was no Sixth Amendment violation rendered analysis of the Commonwealth’s harmless error argument unnecessary
  • noting that the affirmance of the appeal on the merits rendered analysis of the Commonwealth’s harmless-error argument unnecessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.