Skip to main content
· 6/28/2002

Blacklight Power, Inc. v. James E. Rogan, Director, Patent and Trademark Office

Citations

  • 295 F.3d 1269
  • 63 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1534
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12901
  • 2002 WL 1397076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming that USPTO officials reasonably acted within their authority when withdrawing a patent from issuance in order to fulfill the USPTO’s mission to issue only valid patents
  • considering it the “responsibility, and the mission of the PTO . . . to assure that patents are properly examined, and valid” (citing 35 U.S.C. § 151 and Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 139–40 (1944)
  • “Correct statutory interpretation is that which is most harmonious with [the statutory] scheme .... ” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Clevenger, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.