Blackhawk Mining, LLC v. Richard Blankenship

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the position taken in the Tate Letter became the official policy of the United States government
• noting that in Ricaud v. American Metal Co., 246 U.S. 304, 38 S.Ct. 312, 62 L.Ed. 733 (1918), Oetjen, supra, and Underhill, supra, the conduct \was the public act of those with authority to exercise sovereign powers\ (emphasis added
• noting that in Ricaud v. American Metal Co., 246 U.S. 304, 38 S.Ct. 312, 62 L.Ed. 733 (1918), Oetjen, supra, and Underhill, supra, the conduct \was the public act of those with authority to exercise sovereign powers\ (emphasis added)
• explaining that “the authority of [Berizzi Brothers] has been severely diminished by later cases”
• noting that in Ricaud v. American Metal Co., 246 U.S. 304, 38 S.Ct. 312, 62 L.Ed. 733 (1918), Oetjen, supra, and Underhill, supra, the conduct “was the public act of those with authority to exercise sovereign powers” (emphasis added
• noting that in Ricaud v. American Metal Co., 246 U.S. 304, 38 S.Ct. 312, 62 L.Ed. 733 (1918), Oetjen, supra, and Underhill, supra, the conduct “was the public act of those with authority to exercise sovereign powers” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).