Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Co. v. Ziomek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “to be enforceable under the [Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act], the foreign judgment must have been entered by a court with jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter”
• explaining that “to be enforceable under the [Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act], the foreign judgment must have been entered by a court with jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter”
• noting that insufficiently briefed issues on appeal may be deemed abandoned
• indicating that a collateral attack on a judgment of a sister state “may be made in the courts of this [s]tate by showing that the judgment sought to be enforced was void for want of jurisdiction in the court which issued it”
• indicating that a collateral attack on a judgment of a sister state “may be made in the courts of this [s]tate by showing that the judgment sought to be enforced was void for want of jurisdiction in the court which issued it”
• “ ‘[C]ollateral attack may be made in the courts of this state by showing that the judgment sought to be enforced was void for want of jurisdiction in the court which issued it.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).