Indiana Supreme Court· 12/28/1995
Blackburn v. Sweeney
Citations
- 659 N.E.2d 131
- 1995 Ind. LEXIS 215
- 1995 WL 762082
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the primary goal behind the doctrine of comity is the promotion of good will between jurisdictions and uniformity of decisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selby, Shepard, Debruler, Dickson, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1972-03-29· cited 788×
- Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 218×
- Thomas Blackburn and Raymond T. Green v. Charles Sweeney, Jr. And Daniel H. PfeiferSeventh Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 27×
- Burke v. BurkeIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-07-21· cited 11×
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. ZimmermanFourth Circuit· 1935-04-02· cited 7×
- Blackburn v. SweeneyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-07-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.