Skip to main content

Blackburn v. State

Citations

  • 44 Tex. 457

Syllabus

<p>1. Theft—Ownership.—IE a person has taken actual control and is in full possession of a horse so as to be responsible to the true owner for the disposition of it, and the horse is taken out of his possession by one having no right or authority, it is a trespass against the temporary possessor; and if taken with intent to steal, the indictment may allege the horse to he the property of the person from whose possession it was taken.</p> <p>2. Theft—Intent.—Evidence that the accused once rode for several days an estray horse in the neighborhood of its range, is not proof of a felonious taking.</p> <p>3. Ownership—Theft.—See facts held insufficient proof of ownership as alleged to sustain a conviction of theft.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if goods are stolen from someone who does not actually own them, but does possess them, that individual retains a greater right of possession than a thief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.