Blackberry, Kentucky & West Virginia Coal & Coke Co. v. Kentland Coal & Coke Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suing to enjoin a longstanding discriminatory practice of diverting all immigrant students to non-traditional school programs
• finding a state attorney general had parens patriae standing to bring a § 1983 action in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses, Equal Educational Opportunities Act (EEOA
• denying school district’s motion to dismiss Title VI claim where the complaint alleged ELL immigrant students were diverted into “alternative, unequal educational settings” and normal recordkeeping practices were ignored “resulting in these student’s enrollment attempts not being captured”
• finding a sufficiently pled EEOA claim where the complaint alleged that LEP immigrants “were denied equal educational opportunities on the basis of their national origin as part of a diversionary policy enacted and enforced by senior policymakers in the District”
• alleging a “policy and practice” of “mandatory ‘English as a second language’ . . . program for immigrant students aged 17–20” seeking to enroll at Proctor High School, “regardless of whether or not the student expressed a wish to attend ‘regular’ high school”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).