Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 8/16/1984
Black v. State
Citations
- 677 S.W.2d 150
- 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 5938
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- effect of granting habeas relief because of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal is to set aside mandate of affirmance
- effect of granting ha-beas relief because of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal is to set aside mandate of affirmance
- “[P]romises made to the appellant to induce him to take his polygraph examination did not “taint” nor render the appellant’s confession inadmissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Duggan, Bullock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Supreme Judicial DistrictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-05· cited 62×
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 52×
- Port v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-04-25· cited 48×
- Pichon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-07-07· cited 2×
- Devon Grant McCorkle v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2023-10-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.