Skip to main content

Black v. State

Citations

  • 151 S.W.3d 49
  • 2004 Mo. LEXIS 135
  • 2004 WL 2663641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the relative strength or weakness of the prosecution’s case is significant in deciding if any deficiencies in trial counsel’s performance was prejudicial
  • holding trial 16 counsel was ineffective in failing to impeach multiple witnesses with prior inconsistent statements related to the “central issue” of defendant’s intent
  • finding IAC prejudice where unoffered evidence “went to a central, controverted issue on which the jury focused during deliberations”
  • the right to cross examine witnesses is essential and indispensable, and a trial judge may not exclude cross-examination at all regarding a proper subject
  • “If believed by the jury, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different.”
  • similar statement of the rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laura Denvir Stith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.