Black v. Savory

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the MMPA “is both written and construed broadly to serve its purpose of consumer protection”
• holding that the MMPA “is both written and construed broadly to serve its purpose of consumer protection”
• concluding, pre-2020 MMPA amendment, that the plaintiff plausibly alleged an unlawful practice where he alleged “45% non-functional, slack- filled space” in a candy box
• finding consumer stated unjust enrichment claim based on purchase of product with alleged misrepresentation
• finding unjust enrichment claim sufficiently pled under Missouri law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).