Black v. McCarley's Ex'r

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding pre- 8 filing procedures aimed at resolving disputes prior to proceeding before this Court
• stating that this factor accounts for “the amount of 19 money requested in relation to the seriousness of the defendant’s conduct, whether large sums of 20 money are involved, and whether the recovery sought is proportional to the harm caused by 21 defendant’s conduct”
• rejecting the plaintiff’s argument “that the Court 19 does have subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiffs challenged the adequacy of 20 the recall program” and finding that the defendants adequately detailed “the 21 comprehensive nature of the recall program”
• Paragraph 25(b)(1) providing that absent emergencies, “no 14 request for determination shall be filed sooner than 15 days after the conclusion of negotiations”
• “The Stillaguamish Tribe may at any future time apply to this court for hearing . . . regarding expanded usual and accustomed fishing places so long as such application is in accordance with paragraph 25 of the court’s injunction.”
• compiling various orders in the overall matter from 1991–1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).