Skip to main content
· 10/5/2001

Black v. Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corp.

Citations

  • 112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 445
  • 92 Cal. App. 4th 917
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8676
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 10731
  • 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “an inconsistency or contradiction with federal law does not exist merely because the state requires disclosures in addition to those required by and under TILA”
  • “[T]he preemption language of the Parity Act does not contain a clear manifestation of congressional intent to preempt all state laws concerning the terms and marketing of alternative mortgage transactions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haerle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.