· 9/29/2015
Black v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 134 F. Supp. 3d 255
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130960
- 2015 WL 5730583
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding Rule 3:5-7(b) does not require that the facts pertaining to a disputed motion to suppress be established by affidavit pursuant to Rule 1:6-6 for the purpose of the court's determination whether there are facts in dispute requiring an evidentiary hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.