Black v. Coker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an error harmless partially because the testimony was unlikely to explain away the State’s charges
• applying harmless error analysis to the issue of presentation of inaccurate information to a grand jury
• “If the failure to inform the grand jury [of a letter from counsel] was strategic or intentional, we might conclude otherwise.”
• “A challenge to the denial of a motion for remand generally must be made by special action before trial, and is not reviewable on direct appeal.” (quoting Francis v. Sanders, 222 Ariz. 423, 426, ¶ 9 (App. 2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).