Skip to main content

Black v. Black

Citations

  • 657 A.2d 964
  • 441 Pa. Super. 358
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that foreign country may be considered “home state” for purposes of UCCJA
  • ruling that foreign country may be considered “home state” for purposes of applying UCCJA
  • applying UCCJA to international child custody disputes and construing the definition of \State\ to encompass foreign nations
  • “An appellate court may affirm the actions of a trial court for reasons other than those proffered by the trial court hearing such matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamilia, Johnson, Hudock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.