Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/12/1995
Black v. Black
Citations
- 657 A.2d 964
- 441 Pa. Super. 358
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 888
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that foreign country may be considered “home state” for purposes of UCCJA
- ruling that foreign country may be considered “home state” for purposes of applying UCCJA
- applying UCCJA to international child custody disputes and construing the definition of \State\ to encompass foreign nations
- “An appellate court may affirm the actions of a trial court for reasons other than those proffered by the trial court hearing such matter”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamilia, Johnson, Hudock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ivaldi v. IvaldiSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-12-23· cited 27×
- Dincer v. DincerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-19· cited 18×
- Favacchia v. FavacchiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-27· cited 9×
- Troup v. Tri-County Confinement Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-02-27· cited 8×
- Ivaldi v. IvaldiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-03-15· cited 8×
- Dincer v. DincerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-05· cited 6×
- Kriebel v. KriebelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 5×
- Garg v. GargCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-02· cited 5×
- Van Dyke v. Van DykeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-22· cited 3×
- Zimbicki v. ZimbickiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-28· cited 1×
- M.A.S. v. M.W.N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-03-27
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Goodman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-04-06· cited 49×
- Hattoum v. HattoumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-05· cited 42×
- Barndt v. BarndtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-30· cited 37×
- Warman v. WarmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-08· cited 29×
- In Re Custody of SaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-28· cited 27×
- Merman v. MermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-14· cited 17×
- Simpkins v. DisneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-07-22· cited 12×
- Hovav v. HovavSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-31· cited 9×
- Soloski v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-19· cited 7×
- In Re Custody of JSSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-23· cited 7×
- Boudwin v. BoudwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.