Skip to main content
· 1/9/1984

Black Leaf Products Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 4 Cl. Ct. 307
  • 1984 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that magistrate judge did not have authority to enter a final order in postjudgment award of fees and costs
  • concluding that motions for fees and costs “are not to be determined by a Magistrate Judge”
  • holding that a motion for Rule 37 sanctions is dispositive
  • dismissing appeal from unauthorized order issued by magistrate judge but remanding to district court for corrective action
  • “When a magistrate judge determines a non-excepted, pending pretrial matter, the district court has the authority to ‘reconsider’ the determination, but under a limited standard of review.”
  • “When a magistrate judge determines a non-excepted, pending pretrial matter, the district court has the authority to ‘reconsider’ the determination, but under a limited standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nettesheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.