· 1/9/1984
Black Leaf Products Co. v. United States
Citations
- 4 Cl. Ct. 307
- 1984 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1521
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that magistrate judge did not have authority to enter a final order in postjudgment award of fees and costs
- concluding that motions for fees and costs “are not to be determined by a Magistrate Judge”
- holding that a motion for Rule 37 sanctions is dispositive
- dismissing appeal from unauthorized order issued by magistrate judge but remanding to district court for corrective action
- “When a magistrate judge determines a non-excepted, pending pretrial matter, the district court has the authority to ‘reconsider’ the determination, but under a limited standard of review.”
- “When a magistrate judge determines a non-excepted, pending pretrial matter, the district court has the authority to ‘reconsider’ the determination, but under a limited standard of review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nettesheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.