B.J.S. Ex Rel. N.S. v. State Education Department/The University of the State of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presumption that a plaintiff will continue to challenge an IEP year after year, regardless of what is recommended by the CSE, does not create a “reasonable expectation” of recurrence
• “a party may not, by its own conduct, create the appearance of an actual controversy to avoid mootness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).