Bjordahl v. Bjordahl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prior decision would seem to permit court to consider nonsupport “an act outside the state causing injury or damage inside the state”
• court had jurisdiction, by virtue of continuing jurisdiction of Minnesota divorce decree, over defendant who had not resided or transacted business in State for twenty-two years
• the court found continuing jurisdiction to enforce a nine year old divorce judgment against a defendant who had not resided in or had business contact with the forum State for twenty-two years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).