Bj Services Company v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding indefiniteness “is amendable to resolution by the jury where the issues are factual in nature”
• “Like enablement, definiteness, too, is amenable to resolution by the jury where the issues are factual in nature.”
• “[D]efiniteness, too, is amenable to resolution by the jury where the issues are factual in nature.”
• “[D]efiniteness . . . is amenable 27 to resolution by the jury where the issues are factual in nature.”
• “[D]efiniteness … is amenable to resolution by the jury where the issues are factual in nature.
• “[D]efiniteness is amenable to resolution by the jury where the issues are factual in nature. Because the issues here are essentially factual, we review the jury’s verdict to determine if the ultimate conclusion reached is supported by substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).