B&J Elec., Co. v. Cincinnati
Citations
- 156 N.E.3d 974
- 2020 Ohio 3869
Syllabus
MUNICIPAL – TAX – EQUAL PROTECTION – RIGHT TO MARRY: The trial court did not err in rejecting plaintiff corporation's claim that a city ordinance violated the fundamental right of its owner to marry and in upholding the denial of the application for recertification of the corporation as a small business enterprise: the corporation failed to negate a rational basis for the city's ordinance requiring that both spouses' assets be used to determine whether the corporation qualifies as a small business for purposes of renewal of its small business enterprise certification under the city's code.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.