Bivins v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a Florida Supreme Court, rules decision declining to adopt a statutory amendment to the extent it is procedural does “not vitiate or, overturn the statute” and “the statute remains the law in Florida”
• noting that there is little case law on the privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michael Clare, M.D. v. Lynch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-21· cited 14×
• Davis v. Karr
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-01-25· cited 3×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C. v. Zimmer
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1976-04-09· cited 95×
• Milinazzo v. State Farm Insurance
  S.D. Florida· 2007-12-11· cited 43×
• First Union Nat. Bank v. Turney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-26· cited 37×
• First Union Nat. Bank v. Whitener
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-12· cited 17×
• 1550 Brickell Associates v. Q.B.E. Insurance
  S.D. Florida· 2008-10-20· cited 13×
• In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-07-10· cited 12×
• Jacob v. Barton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-28· cited 9×
• State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Puig
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-23· cited 9×
• Barnett Banks Trust Co., NA v. Compson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-20· cited 8×
• Tripp v. Salkovitz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-08· cited 5×
• Karim H. Saadeh v. Michael Connors, Colette Meyer Deborah Barfield and Jacob Noble
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-24· cited 5×
• Dykstra v. Florida Foreclosure Attorneys, PLLC
  S.D. Florida· 2016-06-13· cited 2×
• State v. Carter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-30· cited 1×