Bivens Ex Rel. Green v. Albuquerque Public Schools

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiff’s claim “that his wearing of sagging pants is 9 constitutionally protected speech” because he failed to show “a great likelihood that the 10 message would be understood by those who observe the conduct”
• “The 11 wearing of a particular type or style of clothing usually is not seen as expressive conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).