Skip to main content
· 7/6/2005

Bitz v. Bitz

Citations

  • 934 So. 2d 507
  • 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10477
  • 2005 WL 1560270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that bystanders to medical malpractice may not recover for emotional distress
  • allowing recovery by one who has been constantly at patient’s bedside could lead hos- pitals to curtail visitation hours
  • looking beyond foreseeability, this court imposed limitations on the right of a bystander to recover for emotional distress that allegedly resulted from medical malpractice of doctors in their treatment of the plaintiffs deceased mother
  • noting difficulty of establishing causation with respect to whether emo- tional distress derives from witnessing of injury or sim- ply ordinary grief stemming from loss or suffering of loved one
  • looking beyond foreseeability, this court imposed limitations on the right of a bystander to recover for emotional distress that allegedly resulted from medical malpractice of doctors in their treatment of the plaintiffs . . . mother
  • looking beyond foreseeability, this court imposed limitations on the right of a bystander to recover for emotional distress that allegedly resulted from medical malpractice of doctors in their treatment of the plaintiff's deceased mother

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cortiñas, Rothenberg, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.