Bituminous Ins. Cos. v. Ruppenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presumption of validity arises when a claim is settled by release or covenant and, thereafter, one challenging the release bears the burden of proving invalidity
• presumption of validity arises when a claim is settled by release or covenant and, thereafter, one challenging the release bears the burden of proving invalidity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. United Airlines
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2003-01-24· cited 86×
• Ruffino v. Hinze
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-03-29· cited 30×
• Smith v. Texaco, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-07-20· cited 26×
• Snoddy v. Teepak, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-14· cited 23×
• Roberson v. Belleville Anesthesia Associates, Ltd.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-05-09· cited 18×
• Orejel v. York Intern. Corp., Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-03-26· cited 17×
• Jachera v. Blake-Lamb Funeral Homes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-26· cited 11×
• Jachera v. Blake-Lamb Funeral Homes, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-26· cited 4×
• Orejel v. York International Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-03-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-19· cited 128×
• Barreto v. City of Waukegan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-05-07· cited 87×
• Wasmund v. Metropolitan Sanitary District
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-06-17· cited 38×
• Yale Development Co. v. Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-03-31· cited 29×
• Perez v. Espinoza
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-10-23· cited 29×
• Morris v. Anderson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-02-25· cited 10×