· 1/23/1996
Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Advanced Adhesive Technology, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Georgia Pad, Inc.
Citations
- 73 F.3d 335
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 836
- 1996 WL 5625
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the exclusion clause contemplated “environmental contamination,” and rejecting a broader application to consumer claims
- construing insurance policy so as to \most accurately reflect[ ] the intention of the parties to the insurance contract\
- carpet mastic gave off toxic gases in a confined boat cabin space causing death not within exclusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hatchett, Dubina, Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.