Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Sand Livestock Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding carbon monoxide to be a “gaseous irritant or contaminant” and thus within the “extremely broad” definition of “pollutants”
• “Although the court in Koloms looked beyond the bare language of the exclusion to find ambiguity, we find it inappropriate and unwise to do so. An ambiguity exists only if the language of the exclusion is susceptible to two interpretations.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).