Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Northern Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because insurer was not required to defend against action on loss excluded under policy, attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses were not recoverable
• general contractor’s claim under commercial general liability policy for damages resulting from contractor’s effort to repair faulty workmanship excluded under business risk exclusion
• damage was not to “other property” where “the insured was the general contractor and thus responsible for the entire construction project”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).