Bitter v. City of Lincoln

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, while special assessments need not correspond precisely to the benefits received, they may not be “arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable”
• in error proceedings findings and conclusions of board of equalization, which acts judicially, have weight and conclusiveness of verdict of jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).