Biton v. Menda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the court’s own experience to reduce copying costs to a “reasonable estimate of the costs to copy documents necessary for this litigation.”
• applying the court's own experience to reduce copying costs to a “reasonable estimate of the costs to copy documents necessary for this litigation.”
• disallowing attorney travel expenses as taxable costs and noting that, unlike other statutes, Section 216(b) does not mention the recovery of expenses
• declining to award costs for serving subpoena on the plaintiff’s damages expert because the plaintiff agreed to produce the expert “sans subpoena,” and the defendant made no showing that the expert was being evasive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).