Biton v. Abrutyn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although claims were not barred by Rooker-Feldman doctrine, they were barred by res judicata
• noting that “[i]t may be more accurate…to read [the] complaint and briefs in this court as acquiescing in the state court’s judgment…and asking simply for a new ruling on the pure issues of law. In that case, we do not face a Rooker-Feldman problem”
• plaintiff’s claim not barred by Rooker-Feldman if plaintiff is “acquiescing in the state court’s judgment, including the penalties it imposed, and asking simply for a new ruling on the pure issues of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).