Bistricer v. J. & M. Knitting Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consequential damages were not available where the damages were not foreseeable, and the contract of insurance did not “contain any language which permits recovery for consequential damages”
• dismissing insured’s action seeking reimbursement from insurer where the insurer “improperly” discontinued payments resulting in the foreclosure of the insured property, reasoning that foreclosure was not foreseeable at the time of contracting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).