Bissonnette v. Wylie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that parties’ understanding of agreement as reflected in their actions is relevant to interpreting ambiguous agreement
• explaining that parties’ understanding of agreement as reflected in their actions is relevant to interpreting ambiguous agreement
• ‘We agree with the trial court's conclusion, but use a different rationale to reach it.”
• “We agree with the trial court’s conclusion, but use a different rationale to reach it.”
• trial court findings will not be set aside unless, viewing evidence in light most favorable to prevailing party, they are clearly erroneous
• “We agree with the trial court’s conclusion, but use a different rationale to reach it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).