Bisso v. Calvo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants “proffered legitimate reasons for preferring” their chosen forum because of its close nexus with the factual allegations
• finding that de- fendants “proffered legitimate reasons for preferring” their chosen forum because of its close nexus with the factual allegations
• finding that de- fendants “proffered legitimate reasons for preferring” their chosen forum because of its close nexus with the factual allegations
• finding that the Southern District of Florida and the District of Columbia were equally capable and presumptively competent to decide issues of federal law, specifically as they relate to the APA
• “[G]eneral descriptions of the involvement of individuals in the District of Columbia are insufficient to create a substantial factual nexus between this case and the District of Columbia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).