Bisong v. University of Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Supreme Court and the Fifth Circuit have held that a private right of action exists under Title VI only for violations involving intentional discrimination.”
• “The ‘cat’s paw’ theory recognizes that the discriminatory animus of a manager can be imputed to the ultimate decision maker if the decision maker acter as a rubber stamp, or the ‘cat’s paw,’ for the subordinate employee’s prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).