Bisno v. Bisno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where parties agreed to finite number of payments that provided tax deductions to husband, “there [was] no ambiguity. The parties intended these payments ... to be qualifying permanent alimony payments and not a property settlement as claimed by the wife”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Winokur v. Winokur
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1988-02-25· cited 28×
• Manuel v. Manuel
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-09-06· cited 22×
• Usher v. Usher
  N.D. Georgia· 1977-12-28· cited 16×
• Nash v. Nash
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-11-21· cited 14×
• Wimpey v. Pope
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-10-08· cited 13×
• Duncan v. Duncan
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-09-28· cited 12×
• Hathcock v. Hathcock
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-09-04· cited 10×
• Daniel v. Daniel
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-05-24· cited 9×
• Miller v. Fannin
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1985-11-13· cited 8×
• Solomon v. Solomon
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-04-03· cited 7×
• Hollandsworth v. Hollandsworth
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-01-04· cited 5×
• Crosby v. Lebert
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-04-28· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Allen v. Withrow
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1959-10-09· cited 23×
• Morris v. Padgett
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1975-02-18· cited 17×
• Eastland v. Candler
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1970-07-15· cited 14×
• Newell v. Newell
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-10-05· cited 12×
• Davis v. Welch
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1965-01-07· cited 10×