Bishops Bay Founders Group, Inc. v. Bishops Bay Apartments, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proof of continuous and exclusive use of mark for five or more years establishes prima facie evidence of secondary meaning
• “As to the Rule 408 argument, defendant may renew its objection if and when plaintiff attempts to use the letter as evidence.”
• “[T]he intent factor requires a showing of defendant’s ‘intent to confuse customers, not merely the intent to use a mark that is already in use somewhere else.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).