Bishop's Administrator v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury could “infer intent and affirmative acts to induce infringement based on [defendant’s] attempts to design 27 lenses to meet Apple’s specifications,” assuming that defendant knows those lenses end up in the U.S.
• finding that a defendant that shipped a small number of product samples into the United States imported those products into the country under the meaning of Section 271(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).