Bishop v. State
Citations
- 96 Miss. 846
- 52 So. 21
Syllabus
<p>•Criminal Law and Procedure. Murder. Insanity. Evidence. Reasonable doubt. Confessions. Opinions.</p> <p>In a murder case, wherein the defense is insanity:—</p> <p>(a) However horrible the crime, there is no responsibility for it if the accused were insane, or if the evidence raises a reasonable doubt as to his sanity; and</p> <p><6) The court should give defendant all latitude the law allows, rather than unduly restrict him, in the introduction of testimony; and</p> <p>(o) A witness who had known defendant in his youth, had seen him frequently and known him intimately for many years, should be allowed to testify to his opinion as to whether he was sane or insane; and</p> <p>id) Where the state counts upon a confession, evidence of all that was said and done at the time the alleged confession was made is competent as going to show whether or not the confession was voluntary and whether defendant was sane or insane.</p>
Judges: Whiteield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harvey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1968-02-19· cited 64×
- McGarrh v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 42×
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1977-02-09· cited 23×
- Keeler v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-12-19· cited 15×
- State v. ButnerNevada Supreme Court· 1950-07-06· cited 7×
- Holloway v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 7×
- Warren v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1973-12-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.