Bishop v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “However, there exists no requirement of proof of pecuniary loss under the provisions of OCGA § 16-8-3 to sustain a conviction for theft by deception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Callendar v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-03-11· cited 26×
• Schroerlucke v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-09-21· cited 4×
• Ruffin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-05-21· cited 2×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-03· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Grant v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-04-30· cited 265×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-09-09· cited 71×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-04-25· cited 23×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-04-17· cited 21×
• Fain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-01-25· cited 20×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-09-22· cited 17×
• Hill v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-06-21· cited 13×
• Arnold v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-11-10· cited 10×
• Harrell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-09-05· cited 7×
• Worley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-09-08· cited 5×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-01-07· cited 2×