Skip to main content
· 11/1/1968

Bishop v. Schield Bantam Company

Citations

  • 293 F. Supp. 94
  • 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “winding up” provision contained in Iowa statute similar to Cal.Corp. Code § 2010 did not encompass defense of lawsuits for post-dissolution claims, and hence that such suits were not authorized by the statute
  • “Statutes relative to litigation against a dissolved corporation are liberally construed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMANUS

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.