Skip to main content
· 3/5/2007

Bishop v. Oakstone Academy

Citations

  • 477 F. Supp. 2d 876
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15181
  • 2007 WL 709332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing claims because plaintiffs failed to allege “that any of the Board Members acted except through the corporation”
  • “[I]t is well established that a moving party may not raise new issues for the first time in its reply brief.”
  • “[I]t is well established that a moving party may not raise new issues for the first time in its reply brief”
  • “[I]t is well established that a moving party may not raise new issues for the first time in its reply brief.”
  • Ohio allows parent to recover damages for loss of filial consortium upon showing that Defendant tortiously caused physical injury to minor child
  • “Plaintiffs withdrew their request for a due process hearing and pursued no other administrative remedies before bringing this action. Thus, Plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies as the IDEA requires.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marbley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.