Skip to main content
· 6/30/1960

Bishop v. Norell

Citations

  • 353 P.2d 1022
  • 88 Ariz. 148
  • 1960 Ariz. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he general rule is that a writing . . . is ‘signed’ in accordance with the statute of frauds if it is signed by the person to be charged by any of the known modes of impressing a name on paper, . . . provided that same is done with the intention of signing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Struckmeyer, Phelps, Bernstein, Udall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.